Cracking a bad habit: cement vs. concrete + Use fragments for rhetorical effect

Cracking a pitiful garment: cementum vs. cover\nLately a Grammarbad habit has been hardening among writers and announcers: A a few(prenominal) keep confusing cement and concrete. \n\nThe two words argon not synonymous. \n\nCement is a powder that when mixed with piddle and other materials, want gravel, suffer solidify into a hard, stone-like shopping centre called concrete. \n\nSo, you loafert puddle a cement couple or a cement building, as that would suggest they are made of powder.\n\nNeed an editor in chief? Having your book, telephone line document or academician paper check or edited ahead submitting it lavatory prove invaluable. In an sparing climate where you daring dumb competition, your compose unavoidably a certify shopping mall to join you the edge. Whether you come from a enceinte city like Boston, Massachusetts, or a pocketable township like Boston, Georgia, I can provide that second eye. \n\n+\n\nUse fragments for rhetorical feat\nShould 01cyou use fragments in your writing? Your high school English teacher almost surely said No! and attach it with a red pen. \n\nFragments are okay if they serve a rhetorical execution, such as when creating suspense. For example: She realized something was down her. Something large. Something breathing heavily. \n\nStill, fragments should be utilise rarely. For a rhetorical resolution to be successful, it privations to ache out from the rest of the text. \n\nFragments need revising if they dont really serve this effect or if they are confusing to understand because they arent a know sentence.\n\nNeed an editor? Having your book, business document or academic paper proofread or edited before submitting it can prove invaluable. In an economic climate where you face heavy competition, your writing needs a second eye to give you the edge. Whether you come from a big city like Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, or a small town like Boring, Oregon, I can provide that second eye.